Newsletter

No Coverage under Physician’s Professional Liability Policy for Employees’ Sexual Harassment Claims

March 2001

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently affirmed a lower court's ruling that, under Kentucky law, a physician's professional liability insurance policy does not cover claims brought by his former employees for sexual harassment. DiBeneditto v. Medical Protective Co., No. 9906525, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 2497 (6th Cir. Feb. 8, 2001). (Please note that this decision was not recommended for full-text publication. Sixth Circuit Rule 28(g) may limit citation to specific situations.)

A Kentucky physician brought this action against his insurer seeking coverage under a professional liability policy for underlying suits brought against him by two former employees alleging sexual harassment and related causes of action. The applicable policy provided coverage for "any claim for damages . . . based on professional services rendered. . . ." The policy also had a "business enterprise exclusion" that barred coverage for "any liability growing out of the ownership, operation or supervision of the Insured or an employee of the Insured of . . . any business enterprise. . . ." The lower court ruled that the sexual harassment claims were not covered under the policy for two reasons. First, the lower court concluded that the physician's alleged conduct did not constitute "professional services." Second, the lower court determined that the "business enterprise exclusion" barred coverage. The physician appealed.

Upon review, the Sixth Circuit focused on the meaning of "professional services" as used in the policy. The court noted that, under Kentucky law, "the term ‘professional services' is properly defined as requiring an exercise of judgment or training." Thus, the court concluded that the physician's conduct at issue did not relate to the rendering of professional services "because it bore no connection to his education and training as a physician." The Sixth Circuit did not reach the issue of whether coverage was barred under the "business enterprise exclusion."

Read Time: 1 min
Jump to top of page

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek