Newsletter

Excess Insurer Did Not Act in Bad Faith by Disclaiming Coverage Based on a Professional Liability Exclusion

April 2004

A Pennsylvania state trial court has determined that an excess insurer did not act in bad faith by disclaiming coverage based on a professional liability exclusion in a general liability insurance policy, even though the court disagreed with the insurer's determination that the exclusion was applicable. Egger v. Gulf Ins. Co., 2004 WL 516687 (Pa. Ct. Com. Pl. Mar. 10, 2004).

The insurer issued an excess general liability policy to a company that provided security guard services. The underlying litigation arose after an employee died in an accident, and his estate alleged negligence on the part of the company in connection with his death. The excess insurer reserved its rights, contending that the claim "did not arise out of [the company's] security guard or investigative operation," but rather out of "the alleged negligent provision of emergency medical services." After the company was found liable in an amount that implicated the excess insurer's layer, it sought indemnification. The insurer denied coverage, and the company sued alleging breach of contract and bad faith. In a prior ruling, the court had found that the professional liability exclusion in the policy did not preclude coverage.

In this decision, the court held that the insurer did not act in bad faith by denying coverage. The court reasoned that the excess insurer had conducted an appropriate and reasonable investigation of the underlying action and clearly notified the company in a reservation of rights letter that it believed coverage was unavailable. The court also noted that, as an excess carrier, the insurer did not have an obligation to provide coverage until the primary policy had been exhausted. Accordingly, the court concluded that the claimant "failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that [the insurer] lacked a reasonable basis to deny coverage or that it handled the claim improperly or that it was motivated by self-interest or ill will."

For more information, please contact us at 202.719.7130.

Read Time: 2 min
Jump to top of page

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek