Press Release

WRF Secures Victory for Insurance Client as Court Holds D&O Policy Does Not Provide Coverage for Breach of Contract Claims

August 18, 2005

Washington, DC—In a victory for a Wiley Rein & Fielding insurance client, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida has held that a directors and officers liability policy does not provide coverage for breach of contract claims against the insured company.  The court held that the terms of the insuring agreement did not encompass coverage for such claims, relying on the policy’s terms and relevant public policy.  See Waste Corp. of America, Inc. v. Genesis Ins. Co., No. 03-61480 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 5, 2005). 

The underlying lawsuit involved the policyholder’s acquisition of two businesses from three individuals for a cash payment as well as future royalty payments.  In 2001, the three sellers sued the policyholder and alleged that it had breached the terms of the purchase agreement by failing to allow them to manage the day-to-day operations of the business.  The lawsuit alleged breach of contract, fraud and negligent misrepresentation.  After two of the sellers settled their claims against the policyholder, the third seller proceeded to trial, which resulted in a $3 million verdict in his favor on the breach of contract count.  The policyholder settled with the plaintiff post-verdict and subsequently brought suit against the insurer, seeking coverage for that settlement.

The court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer, holding that both Texas and Florida law precluded coverage under the D&O policy for breach of contract damages.  The court based its conclusion on the policy’s language, determining that the insured had not sustained a “Loss” arising from a “Wrongful Act” as required by the policy’s terms.  In so concluding, the court distinguished between “legal” obligations imposed by tort law and contract obligations voluntarily undertaken by the insured.  The court further observed that this result was consistent with the “strong public policy” articulated by a variety of courts against allowing coverage under liability policies for acts within the insured’s control.

Wiley Rein & Fielding attorneys Jason P. Cronic and Cara Tseng Duffield handled the case for Genesis Insurance Company.

Read Time: 2 min

Related Professionals

Contact

Sarah Richmond
Director of Communications
202.719.4423
srichmond@wiley.law 

Jump to top of page

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek