Press Release

Wiley Rein LLP Represents DC KinCare Alliance in Pro Bono Lawsuit Against the District of Columbia Housing Authority

September 22, 2022

Washington, DC – Wiley Rein LLP, a DC law firm, is representing DC KinCare Alliance in a federal lawsuit against the District of Columbia Housing Authority (DCHA) for violating the federal Fair Housing Act, the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (DCHRA), and the U.S. Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Wiley filed the lawsuit this week, on behalf of DC KinCare Alliance, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

DC KinCare Alliance is a nonprofit organization that works to support relative caregivers who raise DC’s most vulnerable and at-risk children whose parents are not able to care for them for reasons including COVID-19, death, incarceration, homelessness, substance use or mental health disorders, abuse or neglect, detainment, or deportation.

DC KinCare Alliance alleges in its complaint that DCHA, when administering its housing assistance programs, regularly discriminates against relative caregivers. Currently, DC residents who participate in either the District’s Housing Choice Voucher Program (HCVP) or its Public Housing Program must request and obtain DCHA’s approval to add a child to their household, “with the exception of the addition of a Family member as a result of birth, adoption, foster placement or court-awarded custody.”

As noted in DC KinCare Alliance’s complaint, DCHA applies two different standards to participants in these two separate housing assistance programs with no legal or rational basis for the distinction. The HCVP regulations require relative caregivers who seek to add children to their household to obtain a custody order, even though the same request could be granted for a Public Housing Program participant with less onerous documentation showing the caregiving relationship, such as school, medical and public benefit records, custodial of powers of attorney, or sworn statements from medical, legal or social services professionals.

“Requiring relative caregivers to obtain a court order to prove children are living in their homes is unnecessary, unfair, and discriminates against these kinship families. DCHA is arbitrarily treating relative caregivers who are HCVP participants differently than they treat residents of public housing, in violation of federal and state laws,” said Marla Spindel, the Executive Director of DC KinCare Alliance. “These caregivers need assistance from the city, and instead they are having to choose between caring for a child in need or losing their housing voucher and becoming homeless.”

The lawsuit argues that DCHA needs to consistently apply its requirements and procedures to all families seeking housing assistance. The housing assistance waitlist has been closed since 2013 because of the extremely large number of applications. As such, no new applications have been accepted in nearly 10 years, and there is “no scheduled time” for the waitlist to be reopened, according to the complaint. Losing their housing voucher would be catastrophic for these relative caregivers raising DC’s at-risk children.

“This case is significant because housing assistance programs are critical components of the District of Columbia’s strategy for combating homelessness,” said Wiley Pro Bono Partner Theodore A. Howard, who is representing DC Kincare Alliance along with associate Lisa Rechden. “By failing to apply consistent rules to all DC families seeking housing assistance, the DCHA denies HCVP participants equal access to essential housing services and discriminates against them based on their familial status.”

Read Time: 3 min

Contact

Sarah Richmond
Director of Communications
202.719.4423
srichmond@wiley.law 

Jump to top of page

Wiley Rein LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek