Representative Experience Archive

We crafted a unique defense to certification, arguing that due to shifting mental state throughout the class period, class treatment was improper.

Amundsen Davis defended a hospital against an employee’s claims of race discrimination in Cook County Circuit Court alleging that the hospital violated the Illinois Human Rights Act when it discharged the employee because of her race. 

Amundsen Davis’s work has resulted in millions of reimbursements and savings for their clients.

Molly Arranz and John Ochoa advised a client on potential defenses to a BIPA class action, given the uniqueness of the finger-scans allegedly captured, which may not be considered “biometric identifiers,” to pursue a dual strategy of potential reduction in class size and success on ultimate merits of the case.

Amundsen Davis has evaluated health care clients’ billing practices to determine compliance with the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) and Stark Law and whether any self-disclosure requirements were triggered.

Amundsen Davis defended a hospital against an employee’s claims of retaliation and sexual harassment in Illinois federal court. 

Through Amundsen Davis’s aggressive motion practice and discovery, the company was able to favorably resolve the matter for a fraction of the amount alleged. 

Amundsen Davis defended a not-for-profit organization against a contractor’s claims of sex discrimination at the Chicago Commission on Human Relations. 

Amundsen Davis’s work prior to the trial resulting in a reduced demand, and the matter resolved for substantially less than previously sought.

Molly Arranz and John Ochoa assisted a client, who has maintained multiple locations where biometric data was allegedly captured, in an early resolution of the claims by which the exposure was significantly reduced.